Shrapnel

by Adam Cadre profile

Horror, Surreal, Time Travel, Historical
2000

Web Site

Return to the game's main page

Reviews and Ratings

5 star:
(34)
4 star:
(66)
3 star:
(46)
2 star:
(14)
1 star:
(5)
Average Rating:
Number of Ratings: 165
Write a review


Previous | << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >> | Next | Show All


- Joel Webster (Madison, WI), July 26, 2010

- Juleske, July 20, 2010

- strikemeyer (Atlanta, Georgia), June 12, 2010

- Patrick M. McCormick (United States), May 28, 2010

8 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
Not My Favorite, May 26, 2010
by tggdan3 (Michigan)

Okay, it's hard to say much without giving away the story but...

First of all, you are in a small area similar to Zork's white house. And you get killed. Then you restart and get killed a different way. And so forth.

One of my big complaints in this one is the lack of interactivity. There are 4 or 5 rooms you just wander around in until some plot happens. The big gimmick here is the way the game interprets things (Spoiler - click to show) Such as forcing you to RESTART when given the quit or restart options on death

I am a big fan of Cadre's other games, to the point where I am now seeking out his other works to play them. This one didn't strike me, however. There was a lot of info dump at the end, and little interactivity.

What was interesting was the choice of medium. For the style of story he was writing, he had 2 choices: IF, or Short Film (in a memento style). The use of IF was daring here, and he is definately one to experiment with his IF styles, and for that I give him credit. This one, I just didn't feel. Even photopia, with its limited choices, gave the illusion of freedom, and I-0 seemed way open, with multiple branches to the ending. With this one, most of the game was pressing the space bar to advance the text, and that wasn't what I was looking for with the IF.

Still, if you're a fan of the story- the story itself is fairly interesting.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- pearceduncan (New Zealand), March 23, 2010

- Sam Kabo Ashwell (Seattle), February 15, 2010

- Divide (Wroclaw, Poland), January 26, 2010

- Amy Kerns (Tucson, AZ), January 16, 2010

- Grey (Italy), December 25, 2009

- jflower, December 18, 2009

- Andreas Teufel (Poland), December 17, 2009

- TempestDash (Cincinnati, Ohio), December 4, 2009

- C.E.J. Pacian (England), November 11, 2009

- Sorrel, October 13, 2009

1 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
Ingenious but unsatisfying, October 12, 2009

I loved the gimmick to this game, something that I doubt would have worked so well in another medium, so I was disappointed to find that the story was fairly shallow. Everything was very linear, and there was little to draw the player in, so the gimmick fell flatter than it could have in a more deeply involved game, and the canned explanation it got at the end, while creative, spoiled a lot of the surreality that was the main reason it worked for me in the first place.

Overall it's a good stylistic experiment, and I just wish it could have been executed in a more emotionally satisfying way.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- lupusrex (Seattle, WA), October 4, 2009

- Pope Richard Corey (Colorado), September 21, 2009

- Hipster Scumbag, July 14, 2009

- Stephen Gilbert (Canada), July 11, 2009

- Fabien Vidal (Tours, France), July 7, 2009

- four1475 (Manhattan, KS), June 13, 2009

- Mark V. (Madrid, Spain), June 2, 2009

- Bart Oshgo, April 16, 2009

- Zharradan, March 10, 2009


Previous | << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >> | Next | Show All | Return to game's main page