Return to the game's main page Reviews and Ratings
Previous | << 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >> | Next | Show All - Janos Biro (Goiânia, Brasil), September 30, 2018 - Joey Jones (UK), September 15, 2018 - mSphix, September 14, 2018 - Spike, August 14, 2018 - ppoulsen, August 4, 2018 - Sungorus, June 21, 2018 - wisprabbit (Sheffield, UK), June 16, 2018 - DustyCypress (Hong Kong), May 19, 2018 - Ruber Eaglenest, May 13, 2018 - Arctic Kona (Great White North), April 19, 2018 - csitrin, April 16, 2018 - Stas, March 26, 2018 - bernatguillen, February 17, 2018 - 1PainfulPocket, January 10, 2018 - tylermac92, January 9, 2018 - Moomoo, December 9, 2017 - Prosilire (New York City), December 3, 2017 - Sergio (Trento, Italy), November 30, 2017 4 of
8 people found the following review helpful:
sentimental drivel, poor writing, but brilliant use of the medium, October 24, 2017by Angharade I really wanted to enjoy this. As far as I understand it, the game was fairly groundbreaking use of the medium at the time. As it stands now, I would not recommend this piece to anyone I would want to get interested in interactive fiction. The writing is genuinely bad, the overall theme of the story feels like someone beating you over the head with cheap emotional shots, and it isn't very interactive at all- text heavy and slow to move into anything resembling action. I have trouble understanding why so many have resonated with this piece, why there's a sense of reverence around it. I have a feeling it's related to timing on my part-and I don't wish to slam anyone who related to or was moved by the piece--I just can't see it. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Remove vote | Add a comment
- jakomo, September 21, 2017 - xochie, September 18, 2017 - enkaye (usa), September 1, 2017 - ja, bo ja, August 28, 2017 - karlnp (Vancouver, BC), August 23, 2017 - Wanderlust, August 3, 2017
|