The Erudition Chamber

by Daniel Freas profile

Fantasy
2003

Return to the game's main page

Reviews and Ratings

5 star:
(1)
4 star:
(10)
3 star:
(11)
2 star:
(3)
1 star:
(0)
Average Rating:
Number of Ratings: 25
Write a review


Previous | << 1 2 >> | Next | Show All


- Edo, August 17, 2023

>INVENTORY - Paul O'Brian writes about interactive fiction

Troubled prose... always weakens a game for me, and it's a pity, because this game is pretty strong in lots of other areas. I found no bugs, which always pleases me, especially in a comp game. It's certainly a quantum leap in quality over Freas' last work (Grayscale), and I feel encouraged that his next game may take the ingenuity shown by Erudition Chamber and combine it with the level of polish needed to make the gameplay experience as enjoyable as it should be.

You wrote this review - Revise it | Direct link | Add a comment

- nosferatu, April 30, 2022

- Cryptic Puffin, December 4, 2021

- Zape, April 15, 2019

- dillof, November 25, 2018

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
A shortish game with four paths through each puzzle, February 3, 2016

In this game, you're being tested to see if you belong to warriors (who use force), artisans (who use mechanical skills), alchemists (who alter the chemical nature of things), or seers (who look at and think about everything).

You are given four puzzles, each of which can be solved in any of the four ways. At the end, you are given one of 6 possible endings, depending on which route you picked.

I enjoyed this game; I tried the seers route first, and got through all the puzzles without a walkthrough.

I then tried the warrior path, but had to use a walkthrough.

Overall, a fun short game. If you are interested in this kind of personality-test-via-choices, as I was, you will like this game.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- Mr. Patient (Saint Paul, Minn.), September 6, 2015

- Adam Myers, September 19, 2013

- DJ (Olalla, Washington), May 9, 2013

- E.K., September 6, 2012

- Sam Kabo Ashwell (Seattle), April 16, 2012

- MonochromeMolly, November 10, 2011

- Corwin71, July 10, 2011

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
Interesting concept, not a strong story, July 10, 2011

The premise of the Erudition Chamber is that the protagonist is being put through a series of tests in order to determine which of four sects -- Warrior, Alchemist, Artisan, Seer -- he belongs to.

To this end, each chamber contains a puzzle with multiple solutions; each of the possible solutions is associated with a given personality trait. There's also some add-on effect, in that certain equipment can be lost or used up if you follow certain solutions. It's an experiment with the idea that the player is essentially defining a character through the way he chooses to act in the world. We see that in RPGs all the time (e.g. in games where you can earn melee experience points every time you swing your sword), but less frequently in IF.

All this said, I'm not sure how well the game actually works as an assessment of personal problem-solving skills. Some of the puzzle solution styles are much more obvious than others, and I found that rather than play through the puzzles as a personality test, I quickly started to try to game the system. Getting the Warrior sect point by bashing through something was usually the easiest option, but also therefore the least satisfying, and it was more fun to try for some other approach. Completist players will likely want to find all four solutions to every puzzle.

The writing is not as interesting. The story, such as it is, is all about being tested. It feels pretty artificial, both in the idea of setting up this test in the first place and in the lore that goes with the various puzzle-solving styles. There's a lot to read about, say, what it means to be a Seer, but very little sense of characters or of the broader setting that would make this kind of world possible.

Personally, I found this piece more interesting as a kind of essay about interactivity and the ways a game might detect and adapt to player preferences than as entertainment. But that's still definitely worth checking out for people who are interested in those questions.

Was this review helpful to you?   Yes   No   Remove vote  
More Options

 | Add a comment 

- Felix Pleșoianu (Bucharest, Romania), March 18, 2011

- loungeman (Bilbao, Spain), January 4, 2010

- Grey (Italy), December 25, 2009

- ensoul, July 23, 2009

- Wesley (Iowa City, Iowa), September 1, 2008

- Havoc Crow, January 1, 2008

- PSilk (London, UK), November 29, 2007

- Steve Evans (Hobart, Tasmania), November 17, 2007

- Nusco (Bologna, Italy), October 31, 2007

- Stephen Bond (Leuven, Belgium), October 26, 2007


Previous | << 1 2 >> | Next | Show All | Return to game's main page