Go to the game's main page
Number of Reviews: 5
Write a review
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:A very playable last-place effort, January 9, 2015
Its last place finish is probably more a result of a stronger field than anything else. Though I can see why people may've disliked it--it's about a journey to ultimate enlightenment, but with loops. A lot of them. There's one choice buried in one loop that breaks another loop, and the text is deliberately obscure, perhaps too obscure. Your choices are questions with no right answers, and while this is part of the shtick, there are almost no ways to get any right answers or clues you are on the right path. It seems philosophically correct that we don't notice that we're getting smarter, but there's no sense of progress or hinting we're doing it wrong besides "oh, this again." I got a semi-messy map out of it, and I stumbled through, but ultimately I didn't feel enlightened.
And three months later, I can't remember what I did, and I'm a bit worried about going back to find out. So I can't say this is a favorite.
Still, the game has a coherent start, a good premise, and a way through that's logical once you see it. It doesn't soar, but it works. It may give unpleasant flashbacks to those books people flog on you at the airport as "gifts," with different spiels whether you're reading a book or not (but could you please give a donation?) & some of the text rattles on. And while I love some so-bad-it's-good, and I've even had fun poking through underimplemented games and reassembling them to find out what's going on, this game feels more like it had good intentions and clear focus on its own but it never translated to the enlightenment it tries to give the player.
I generally try not to rate games I competed against in IFComp, but I feel sad this game has a flat one star. Doing math on the previous ratings, it even needed a three-star rating to bump it up. I can't quite give that in good conscience, but two stars--definitely.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
More Options| Add a comment
Previous | << 1 >> | Next
BlitzWithGuns, January 9, 2015 - Reply
Good review. To tell the truth, I enjoyed playing this game a little. It's not unplayable like the older last placed comp games like Ninja. It's writing was just a little off. There was other games in the comp that deserved lower placings, but won't be mentioned.
Previous | << 1 >> | Next
Andrew Schultz, January 9, 2015 - Reply
Thanks, yeah, with this game, there's definite logic, and I've circled around before making realizations myself. And yeah, it's tough to finger a game that should place below it, because that's kind of not nice to other authors.
I also think the blurb was rather bad--mainly because I was already thinking "Geez, what IS Laterna Magica? A typo?" even before I saw it.
So I think the game sold itself a bit poorly--a better fault than most, but disproportionately heavy in a competition.
BlitzWithGuns, January 10, 2015 - Reply
Yeah, the blurb was pretty hilarious for me! It's like the feeling before you go to sleep and suddenly, you think, "What in the world is Laterna Magica????". And you stay up the whole night just thinking about what it is. The author should have written better if he wants to enter a comp.