Top 10 Reviewer
Member since April 5, 2015
Last visited June 24, 2017
Profile ID (TUID): nufzrftl37o9rw5t
I have been playing IF since downloading Frotz on an iPad in 2010. I love big games with a lot of puzzles and a lot to do, as well as purely narrative games. I've really enjoyed the Twine revolution, but I also love Infocom games and everything in between.
I didn't originally include stars in my reviews, but I've decided on a new system, giving one star for each of the following criteria:
-Polish (no or few implementation errors or typos or bugs, nice styling for web games)
-Interactivity (do I feel part of the story? For kinetic fiction, do I feel invested in the action?)
-Emotional impact (any emotion, whether awe, pathos, fear, disgust, etc.)
-Would I play it again?
Previous | << 1 >> | Next
Thank you for all of the great reviews! They have been incredibly helpful in discovering some amazing games that do not attract as much attention as they should.
I like your rating system with different criteria. However, seeing just the star rating for a game, but not the criteria, I find the rating mysterious - did it score in this criteria or that? I wonder if you could list the criteria in the review. It's possible to give a review personal tags (there is a tag box below the edit box) - you could include the criteria for a game as tags.
I'll second this - great reviews and lists,particularly for unearthing some hidden and forgotten hems. Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for your reviews! They're great, informative and made me discover games I wanted to play. Keep up the good work! :)